21eme Regiment de Ligne
   
 
  Lines of Communication (Forum)
=> Not registered yet?

REMEMBER TO VISIT PAGE TWO, THREE..ETC PAGES OF THE FORUM

Lines of Communication (Forum) - Bored with Drill ? !

You are here:
Lines of Communication (Forum) => General => Bored with Drill ? !
<- Back  1  2  3 

Continue->


David H (Gast)
11/19/2007 7:40pm (UTC)[quote]
Hi Chris,

the question you pose re the clash of the 52nd with the guard at Waterloo deserves a simple answer but there are a number of facets to bear in mind.

A French line battalion of 1812-15 would of course have its own light company which could of couse deploy wholly or partly in skirmish order. If it was expected that enemy cavalry would be in the vacinity then perhaps half of the company would stay in line, say 100m in the rear of the skirmish line. In theory, if the voltigeurs were deployed in this way then the battalion column is unable to use the column of 'divisions',column of campanies would be used.The former formation was used in the later period as it gave the battalion greater firepower and it enable a battalion line to be formed more quickly.
David H (Gast)
11/19/2007 8:00pm (UTC)[quote]
Part 2

As regards the actual attack you refer too, the french unit was a battalion of the Chasseurs of the Guard, which being a light Infantry unit, each company could deploy into skirmish order.However, a least one very creditable source( a senior french officer who took part in the attack writing in 1821) states that the guard actually advanced in open square!(remember what had happened to D'erlons corps in the morning), and therefore it isn't likley that a seperate company or the third rank of each company would be delployed as it would have ruined the integrity of the formation.

It is quite possible that the skirmishers were from other formations which had been badly depleted in the days fighting and joined the attack of the guard in an ad hoc way, rather like a general advance, Officers and men who wished to continue the fight but whose higher formations were no longer present or willing to advance. When the 52nd wheeled into line on the flank of the guard it would have made sense for such sub-units to have moved to counter the attack.

I am sure other members can think of other factors to discuss as weel.

Hope that the above helps, though it might not!

David
Lemauditanglais
(44 posts so far)
11/19/2007 10:50pm (UTC)[quote]
Thanks Keith/David that information fills some holes in my knowledge, I guess it also goes to say that we cant really re-enact such manoeuvres in current numbers and without joint practice with voltigeur/ light inft. type units, which despite their regular attendance at similar events act seemingly totally independantly of our line column formations, there is little opportunity to work/ practice together at such events even assuming there is a willingness to do so. So much to read, so much to learn, so much to try, what a great hobby.
Christopher
Capfour
(322 posts so far)
11/20/2007 10:44am (UTC)[quote]
According to Siborne "Letters from Waterloo" the 52nd Foot wheeled forward to form a line on the flank of the column, they then deployed skirmishers moving them forward quickly to fire into the flank of the column "at any range" ( the intention being to disrupt the advance rather than to cause heavy casualties) the left wing of the column then wheeled into line opened fire on the 52nd, they apparently lost about 150 men in 3 or 4 minutes. The column was then attacked in front (by 3 or 4 companies of the 95th supported by the 71st).

In conclusion it would appear that the Guard remained in line rather than deployed as skirmishers.

Keith



Total topics: 284
Total posts: 1507
Total users: 192
Online now (registered users): Nobody crying smiley
 
Facebook 'Like' Button
 
Commanding Officer
 
Chris Perko
Algrave Hall
Hassock Lane North
Shipley
Derbyshire DE75 7JB
The Adjutant
 
Chris Durkin
7 Lowcroft Crescent
Chadderton
Oldham OL9 9UU
Position of the Regiment
 
25th May
1790 Regiment Guyenne at Lyon
1792: Journal militaire:1st battalion arrived Besancon
1793 Landau, siege until 28th December.
1794 At Nice, General Kellerman formed a Polish battalion with men found in the 21eme demi-brigade, 9 companies of 3 officers and 70 men.
1796 Evening, Massena's division (21e) along left bank of the Ellero, from Mondovi to the Tanaro.
1798 Into garrison at Amiens, 2nd battalion at Nantes (formed March 1797), 3rd at Dunkirk
1799 Magnano, towards Brescia.
1800 Pas de Suse, and town of Suse.
1801 Battalion expeditionnaire formed on the Ile de Re, with 140 of the 21eme, 106 56th Line, 59 5th Light, 58 Colonial depot Ile de re, 28 legion Loire, 119 cannoniers 5th Foot artillery, on the frigate l'Africaine.
1803 Bruges Camp/Ostend, 3/4 battalions Flessigne until July 1804.
1804 3rd and 4th battalions to Cologne.
1805 Crossed the Danube at Pressberg, one battalion at Bruick, other in villages of Regelbrun, Arbestal, Collesbrunn, Willfersnauer, and Schadendorf, until 5th January 1806.
1806 Division Kreus Munster
1807 Division at the Hohenstein camp until 5th June.
1808 Juliers
1809 Division left Ebersdorf for Vienna
1810 Brunswick, until October.
1811 Stade
1812 Division Thorn
1813 Order to form 1st Corps, 1st division, 33rd Provisional demi-brigade (2/12, 2/21) forming near Erfurth, united into corps at Wittenberg.
1814 Bergen op Zoom
1815 Lille









1815 Between Quatre-Bras and Waterloo.
Waterloo 1985
 
Boulogne 1991 on the Video page.
 
This website was created for free with Own-Free-Website.com. Would you also like to have your own website?
Sign up for free